Red List of South African Species

Alternatively, Explore species
Data Deficient (DD)

Rationale

Polysteganus coeruleopunctatus is an important deepwater sparid with a wide distribution in the Western Indian Ocean. This species has become increasingly important in the South African, Mozambican and Madagascan fisheries. Although evidence suggests that stocks may be overexploited in certain heavily fished areas, catch/landings data are not available apart from in South Africa and southern Mozambique, and stock assessments are needed. This species cannot be considered globally threatened at this stage due to its wide distribution and deep water, rocky habitat. However, this species exhibits intrinsic characteristics that make it vulnerable to overexploitation and given the lack of appropriate data on abundance, it is listed as Data Deficient. Additional fishing regulations are recommended for this species as well as additional MPAs that include deep reefs.

Distribution

Polysteganus coeruleopunctatus is widely distributed in the western Indian Ocean and is known from the Red Sea south to at least Coffee Bay in the Transkei in South Africa (Smith and Heemstra 1991, Iwatsuki and Heemstra 2011), and including Madagascar (Fischer and Bianchi 1984). The depth range of this species is 60–450 m (Fennessy and Mann 2013).

Population trend

Trend

No stock assessments have been conducted for Polysteganus coeruleopunctatus; however, declines in catch per unit effort (CPUE) and catch composition indicate that this species may be over-fished in some areas, despite the increasing trend of fishing in deeper water in South Africa and Mozambique (Fennessy and Mann 2013). Contribution by weight to commercial linefish catches in KwaZulu-Natal increased from 2.9 % in 1986 to 5% in 1996 (S. Fennessy, ORI unpublished data). However, subsequently commercial catch composition in KwaZulu-Natal declined from the period 1994–1996 (3.6% by number and 3.4% by weight) to 2008–2009 (0.19% by number and 0.51% by weight) (Mann et al. 1997, Dunlop 2011).Targeted CPUE declined from 1.6 kg/man/hour to 1.2 kg/man/hour from 1985 to 2007 (NMLS unpublished data). In South Africa, the total commercial catch for this species peaked in 1992 at around 60 tonnes and declined steadily until 2003 where it has remained stable at around eight tonnes.

Commercial data show that since 2000 commercial fishing effort has declined dramatically in the South African linefishery from approximately 3,000 to 450 vessels as part of the long-term fisheries rights allocation process implemented in 2006 (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2012).

In southern Mozambique, the species is now the dominant contributor to the semi-industrial linefishery, which has experienced marked declines in CPUE, resulting in some of the fleet moving northward to the Sofala area in central Mozambique, where this species dominates catches (Fennessy et al. 2012, Mutombene 2013). A recent assessment of the southern Mozambique population suggests that it is optimally exploited, and that no increase in fishing effort be allowed (Mutombene 2013).

Threats

Declines in CPUE and catch composition indicate that Polysteganus coeruleopunctatus may be overfished in some areas. The likelihood of overexploitation of this species is increased due to its life history characteristics including hermaphroditism and longevity (Fennessy and Mann 2013). This species may be threatened by localized overfishing in the future as targeting increases as more accessible species are fished out.

Uses and trade

In South Africa, Polysteganus coeruleopunctatus is mainly caught by commercial ski-boats fishing in deeper waters (Dunlop 2011) and is an increasingly important component of the KwaZulu-Natal commercial ski-boat fishery (Mann et al. 1997, Penney et al. 1999). It is also caught in the line, trawl, and trap fishery off Mozambique (Lichucha et al. 1999, Fennessy et al. 2012). In KwaZulu-Natal accessibility to this species is reduced because the fishing grounds occur close to the shelf edge where the strong Agulhas Current often prevents fishing. However, increased targeting for this species is taking place in KwaZulu-Natal with the use of thinner braided lines as other more accessible species are fished out (B. Mann, ORI pers. obs.). This species comprised 88% of catches in an experimental long-line trap fishery in southern Mozambique in 1997 (Lichucha et al. 1999) ), but this fishery was closed in 2000. The species is now the most commonly landed by industrial and semi-industrial linefish boats in southern Mozambique; as catch rates in that region declined, some of the fleet moved further north to central Mozambique (Fennessy et al. 2012), where this species is extremely dominant in catches (Rui Mutombene, Instituto de Investigacao Pesqueira, Maputo; pers. comm.). Much of this catch is exported to Europe; however, there are limited catch/landings data available. Catches in other areas in the Western Indian Ocean are unknown although there is increased recent focus on commercial fishing for reef fishes in Madagascar, and this species is commonly caught there (S. Fennessy, Oceanographic Research Institute, unpubl. data); it is likely that it is confused in markets with Polysteganus baisacci which is caught in the region around Mauritius.

Conservation

In South Africa, there are no species-specific conservation measures for P. coeruleopuctatus but it is included in the overall daily bag limit of ten fish per person per day for recreational anglers (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2012). It is likely that P. coeruleopunctatus receives some protection in the Pondoland, St Lucia and Maputaland marine protected areas (MPAs) (Chater et al. 1993, Mann et al. 2006, Sink et al. 2006), and to some extent in the Ponta do Ouro Partial MPA in Mozambique (S. Fennessy, pers. comm.). 

Stricter conventional fishery regulations should be considered for P. coeruleopuctatus, such as a commercial bag limit. Additional MPAs are also recommended as the deep reefs in the northern part of the KwaZulu-Natal Bight are likely to be prime habitats for this species (Fennessy and Mann 2013). 


Lead agencies, Partners and Funders

See the partners page