Red List of South African Species

Alternatively, Explore species
Least Concern (LC)

Rationale

Global

Sarpa salpa
 is common and locally abundant in suitable habitats throughout its range. The landings data and stock assessment indicate that the S. salpa population is stable throughout most of its range. This species is assessed as Least Concern. We recommend continued monitoring of its population status and harvest levels. In addition, it may become threatened in the eastern Mediterranean by the continued success and competition from Lessepsian siganid migrants from the Red Sea, and this should be closely monitored.

Europe

In European waters, this species is common and can be locally abundant. Landing statistics indicate that the population is stable; however, this species exhibits life history traits that make it more vulnerable to fishing pressure. It is listed as Least Concern but should be closely monitored.

Distribution

Sarpa salpa is widely distributed in the northeastern Atlantic from southwestern France (Bay of Biscay) to Sierra Leone, including the Azores, Madeira, the Canary Islands and the Cape Verde Islands. In the southeastern Atlantic it is known southwards from Congo to South Africa and into the Indian Ocean to southern Mozambique (Carpenter in prep., Heemstra and Heemstra 2004). It is present throughout the Mediterranean Sea, and in the southwestern and southeastern Black Sea. A single record from the North Sea needs to be verified. This species occurs to depths of 70 m.

Population trend

Trend

Sarpa salpa is considered to be underexploited in KwaZulu-Natal (van der Walt and Govender 1996). Catch per unit effort (CPUE) in KwaZulu-Natal increased between 1975–1977 and 1994-1996 from 0.22 fish/angler/day to 0.51 fish/angler/day but declined during 2009–2010 to 0.34 fish/angler/day (Joubert 1981, Mann et al. 1997, Dunlop 2011). However, this may be a result of subtle differences in survey design in the mentioned studies rather than a decrease in abundance (Dunlop 2011) and should therefore be viewed with caution. An increase in CPUE was also recorded on the Eastern Cape coast between 1985–1986 and 1994–1996 from 8.98 g/fisher/hr to 13.4 g/fisher/hr (Clarke and Buxton 1989, Brouwer 1997). Unpublished data from long-term monitoring of shore anglers' catches in KwaZulu-Natal (National Marine Linefish System) revealed a decrease in CPUE from 1985–2008 from 0.25 fish/angler to 0.1 fish/angler but this trend is likely to have been at least partially effected by the introduction of a daily bag limit of ten fish per angler per day introduced in 2005 (Mann and Dunlop 2013).

Fishing mortality was recorded at  F=0.81 year-1 in Kwazulu-Natal from 1994-1995 with SBPR at 60% (van der Walt and Govender 1996). There was an increase in catch composition between 1975–1977 (20.3%) and 1994–1996 (42.9%) in Kwazulu-Natal but a subsequent decline from 2009–2010 (34%) (Joubert 1981, Mann et al. 1997, Dunlop 2011). As mentioned previously, minor differences in survey design by these studies may have resulted in the observed changes in percentage composition (Dunlop 2011). A slight increase was recorded between 1985-86 (21.5%) and 1994–1996 (23.1%) in the Southeastern Cape (Clarke and Buxton 1989, Brouwer 1997). A sex ratio (M:F) of 1.1:1 was recorded in KwaZulu-Natal from 1975–1977 (Joubert 1981) but a ratio of 1.6:1 was later recorded from 1994–1995 in KwaZulu-Natal (van der Walt and Mann 1998).

FAO landing statistics for the Mediterranean Sea show a steady increase over the last 50 years, with a peak in the early 1990s at around 4,000 tonnes and stabilizing at around 2,000 tonnes during the period from 1996 to 2005. This species is very common and very abundant in suitable habitats throughout its range in the Mediterranean Sea. In a study by Akyol and Ertosluk (2010), captures from the sea-cage farms along the coast of the Turkish Aegean Sea, were determined with the use of a special cage trap and trammel net. Hand or longlines and underwater harpoons, although rare, were also in use. This species was dominant and accounted for 10.2% of the total weight of one fish farm from 2004–2008. In the eastern Mediterranean Sea, there is some circumstantial evidence that this species is being displaced and out-competed by Siganus luridus and S. rivuluatus, both of which are herbivores and very successful Lessepsian migrants from the Red Sea (Lundberg et al. 2004). Sarpa salpa has since become very rare along the Lebanese coast despite the large numbers existing there in the 1930s (Bariche et al. 2004).

Threats

Major threats have not been identified for S. salpa but fishing may become a threat

Uses and trade

Sarpa salpa is harvested almost exclusively by shore anglers and subsistence shore fishers throughout its distribution and is the second most important species (by number) caught along the KwaZulu-Natal and Southeastern Cape coast (Joubert 1981, Clarke and Buxton 1989, van der Walt and Govender 1996, Mann et al. 1997, Brouwer 1997, Brouwer et al. 1997, Mann et al. 2003, Dunlop 2011). Throughout its range, this species is exploited by an irregular and not very important fishery. Separate statistics are not reported for this species. Sarpa salpa is caught on line gear, with bottom trawls, trammel nets, beach seines and in traps (Canary Islands) but is mostly discarded in Portuguese fisheries due to it's low market value (Gonçalves et al. 2008) and it is only rarely reported in catches from trawlers in Senegal (DPM 2013 ). It is marketed fresh or frozen, sometimes dried salted (flesh not very highly esteemed) and is also used for fishmeal and oil (Carpenter in press). This species is used for both food and bait (van der Elst 1993).

Conservation

Sarpa salpa is on the Bait list category in South Africa and there is a minimum size limit of 15 cm TL. This species is found in abundance in MPAs between Durban and Cape Town, however, level of protection in these MPAs are not known due to the species' migratory habit (B. Mann ORI pers. obs., Mann et al. 2000). Fishing regulations are recommended because of its relatively slow maturing reproductive strategy. More genetic information would be useful for the management of this species.

Lead agencies, Partners and Funders

See the partners page