Rationale (Changed due to New Information|Other)
This species is widely but patchily distributed across much of sub-Saharan Africa. Within the assessment region, it has been recorded from a number of localities in KwaZulu-Natal around the Durban area and has recently been shown to be more widely distributed, having been recorded from both Kruger (KNP; 11 localities) and Mapungubwe National Parks (MNP; two localities) with an estimated extent of occurrence of 194,973 km² covering 33 known localities in total. Subpopulations are suspected to be stable and (in Limpopo at least) fairly well protected in the assessment region. However, extant synanthropic roof roosts within the greater Durban area, on which the species relies, are rare and may still be subject to persecution from ill-informed home owners. Worryingly, very few breeding males have been recorded or re-sampled in the Durban area within recent times (K. Richardson unpubl. data). While it is difficult to sample due to its high-altitude foraging behaviour, it is considered rare (typically < 1% of recorded calls during acoustic sampling). Since there are typically 10â30 mature individuals in each colony within the assessment region, we infer a mature population size of 330â990 animals. While continuing decline is not suspected, colony sizes are small and vulnerable to local extinction due to roost disturbance and loss. This species thus qualifies as Vulnerable D1 as inferred population size is < 1,000 mature individuals. However, due to its good dispersal capacity, we assume rescue effects are possible and employ the regional criterion to downlist to Near Threatened D1. Further data on its occurrence, subpopulation sizes and trends are urgently needed and this species may qualify for a more threatened listing once additional data are available.Regional population effects: With the discovery of subpopulations in Limpopo and Botswana, this speciesâ range is suspected to be connected with that of Zimbabwe and northeastern Mozambique. Wing-loading is high (Norberg & Rayner 1987), and thus dispersal capacity is assumed to be good, indicating that rescue effects are possible.