Red List of South African Species

Alternatively, Explore species
Least Concern (LC)

Rationale

Though threatened in some areas by loss of habitat, increasing fatalities due to wind turbines and increasing frequency and duration of droughts in parts of its range, the species is listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution (estimated extent of occurrence is 943,008 km2), presumed large population, its occurrence in many protected areas and modified habitats, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category. While monitoring data show an increase in numbers in some urban and peri-urban areas in KwaZulu-Natal, local declines have also been reported due to drought conditions. We infer that the population is stable. However, with a recent increase in wind farms across the eastern part of the assessment region where this species occurs, monitoring fatalities from wind turbines and subsequent impacts on population numbers is required as this may become a severe threat.

Regional population effects: Its habitat is connected to the rest of its southern African range where it is widespread and common, thus we infer that rescue effects are possible.

Distribution

Wahlberg's Epauletted Fruit Bat is found in Central Africa, East Africa and broadly across southern Africa where it is widespread and abundant in the eastern regions (Monadjem et al. 2010). It has been recorded from Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Congo and Angola in the west, through the southern Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. The species is also distributed in East Africa from Uganda, Kenya, southern Somalia, Tanzania (including Zanzibar), Zambia, Malawi and Mozambique into Zimbabwe (ACR 2015). Within the assessment region, the species is distributed in the southern and eastern areas of South Africa, where it has been recorded from the Western Cape through Swaziland (Skinner & Chimimba 2005; Monadjem et al. 2010). The type specimen is from near Durban, KwaZulu-Natal (Monadjem et al. 2010). Its estimated extent of occurrence is 943,008 km2.

Population trend

Trend

Wahlberg's Epauletted Fruit Bat is a common species and numbers appear stable over much of its range and it is well represented in museums, with over 280 specimens examined in Monadjem et al. (2010). For example, monitoring data since 2007 has shown evidence of increasing subpopulations in urban and peri-urban areas in KwaZulu-Natal (C. Schoeman unpubl. data). However, it may be experiencing local declines elsewhere in its range due to a number of threats. For example, declines caused by wind turbines (MacEwan 2016), or extended periods of drought, such as that in KwaZulu-Natal (Bat Interest Group KwaZulu-Natal, unpubl. data). Subpopulations should be systematically monitored so trends can be established.

Threats

While there appear to be no major threats to the species overall, there are several threats that could be causing local declines. The species is threatened by loss of habitat due to dune mining in KwaZulu-Natal. Over the past five years a decline in the population in KwaZulu-Natal has been observed, with the cause suspected to be loss of coastal forest due to dune mining as well as extensive drought (Bat Interest Group KwaZulu-Natal unpubl. data). It is also suspected that the Lagos Bat Virus may be affecting the population as a number of bats caught from Durban and the South Coast have tested seropositive for the virus. Moreover, recent wind farm developments across the eastern portion of the assessment region pose a very serious threat for the species. Bats that fly near to turbine blades, either collide directly with a blade or experience barotrauma, which is the internal bleeding caused by rapid changes in air pressure near the blades Photo 3) (Baerwald et al. 2008; Cryan & Barclay 2009; Rydell et al. 2010). Fatalities from wind turbines for this species were recorded in 2015 and are likely to escalate (MacEwan 2016). The impact that these threats will have on the overall population in the assessment region is currently unknown and the species needs to be monitored especially in relation to mortalities from wind turbines. Roost disturbance and removal of large trees used as roost sites are also plausible threats in some parts of its range.

Uses and trade

There is no evidence that this species is traded or utilised within the assessment region.

Conservation

The species is present in many protected areas, including Kruger National Park. No direct conservation measures are currently needed for this species as a whole. However, identification of key roost sites and subsequent protected area expansion in areas suffering from habitat loss would benefit this species. Additionally, the impact of wind farming should also be monitored to determine resultant population decline. To mitigate mortalities from turbine collisions on wind farms, interventions such as using ultrasound to deter bats and curtailing turbines at low wind speeds could be employed (Baerwald et al. 2009; Berthinussen et al. 2010; Arnett et al. 2011).

Recommendations for land managers and practitioners:
  • Data sharing by wind farm managers into a national database, to be able to calculate cumulative impacts and thereafter implement collaborative mitigation and management efforts, is needed.
Research priorities:
  • Identification of key roost sites and systematic monitoring to determine subpopulation trends.
  • Monitoring mortalities linked with wind farm operations and assessing impact on populations.
  • Investigations into effective mitigation methods to reduce bat mortality around wind farms.
Encouraged citizen actions:
  • Limit disturbance to roost sites.
  • Citizens can assist the conservation of the species by reporting sightings on virtual museum platforms (for example, iSpot and MammalMAP), and therefore contribute to an understanding of the species distribution. This species is easily confused with E. crypturus but can be distinguished by the presence of only one post-dental palatal ridge (Photo 1) (two in E. crypturus) (Taylor & Monadjem 2008).

Lead agencies, Partners and Funders

See the partners page