Red List of South African Species

Alternatively, Explore species
Least Concern (LC)

Rationale

This species is widespread, common and abundant in numerous protected areas within the assessment region. There are well over 10,000 mature individuals (an estimated 158,220–228,012 individuals in 2012 in Kruger National Park alone), and nearly all (if not all) subpopulations are stable or increasing to the extent that large-scale culls are necessary for many areas, which may form the foundation of a sustainable wildlife-based economy in these areas if managed properly. Similarly, the global population is estimated at almost 2 million, of which about 50% are on private land (stable or increasing) and 25% in protected areas (stable). There are no immediate threats to this species, although artificial selection for desired colour traits and/or deliberate hybridisation with Black-faced Impala (A. m. petersi) may compromise the integrity of the wild population if these subpopulations are used in translocations or to establish new subpopulations. However, its future is secure as long as it continues to occur in large, adequately protected populations.

Regional population effects: The species range is generally continuous through East and southern Africa, with only the Black-faced Impala being isolated from these former populations. There is likely to be movement within extensive wildlife regions to facilitate genetic mixing and there is the potential for dispersal across transfrontier boundaries.

Distribution

The Impala’s current distribution range remains largely unchanged from their historical range. The species is native to Angola, Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. It has become locally extinct in parts of Uganda, now only occurring in south-west Uganda in the Lake Mburo National Park (Averbeck 2002), and has been extirpated from Burundi, but has also been introduced to Gabon (East 1999; Fritz & Bourgarel 2013). Although the Common Impala occurs widely in southern and East Africa, from central and southern Kenya to northern KwaZulu-Natal, west to Namibia and southern Angola, the Black-faced Impala (A. m. petersi) is naturally confined to the Kaokoland in the north-west parts of Namibia, and neighbouring south-western Angola (Lorenzen et al. 2006). To guard against its extinction, Black-faced Impala were translocated to south-western Etosha on the edge of the historic Black-faced Impala range (Green & Rothstein 1998). Today, this subspecies occurs between the Otjimborombonga area (ca 12°45'E) and Swartbooisdrift on the Cunene River, southward to the Kaoko Otavi area in the south-western part of the Etosha National Park, and the Kamanjab District just south of the Park (Fritz and Bourgarel 2013). There is no information on the current status of this subspecies in Angola.

Common Impala have been introduced to numerous privately-owned game ranches and small reserves throughout southern Africa. Within the assessment region, this species now occurs in all provinces, although it is extra-limital within the Western, Northern and Eastern Cape as well as the western regions of the North West Province (Castley et al. 2001), and was also introduced into the Hluhluwe-Umfolozi Park in KwaZulu-Natal Province. Common Impala were introduced into the Tussen-die-Riviere Nature Reserve (Plug & Badenhorst 2001) in the Free State Province, mainly for hunting purposes (Watson 2006). Black-faced Impala have been introduced into South Africa for wildlife ranching and hunting purposes (G. Castley unpubl. data).

Population trend

Trend

Population estimates are available for most of the Common Impala’s current range. East (1999) estimated the total numbers of Common Impala at ~ 2 million. Although accurate estimates are not available, the subspecies is considered very common in the assessment region and occurs in almost all of the protected areas. For example, it is estimated that 158,220–228,012 individuals occur within the Kruger National Park alone (2012 distance sampling estimate) and the subpopulation is increasing (Ferreira et al. 2013). The species further occurs on several private game ranches throughout the assessment region. There are > 100 subpopulations within the assessment region. The only real isolation is between the KwaZulu-Natal subpopulations and those in the Lowveld (Mpumalanga, Limpopo) areas. Subpopulations are also fragmented by fencing but the constant trade in live animals of this species ensures gene flow is maintained. However, artificial selection for desired colour traits and/or deliberate hybridisation with Black-faced Impala (A. m. petersi) does pose a threat.

Threats

There are currently no major threats to the species. However, private landowners within the assessment region may be hybridising Common Impala with Black-faced Impala, which would compromise the genetic integrity of the Common Impala population. This has been identified as a severe threat to the Black-faced Impala (Green & Rothstein 1998). However, there was no evidence of natural hybridisation between Black-faced Impala and introduced Common Impala in Etosha National Park, Namibia (Lorenzen & Siegismund 2004). Similarly, selected breeding for colour variants by game ranchers may pose a threat to the genetic diversity of the Common Impala population though increased rates of inbreeding. Such threats should be quantified and monitored. Expanding human settlements, especially along protected area boundaries (Wittemyer et al. 2008), or around conservancies and game farms, may also result in increased poaching of the Common Impala within the assessment region (Lindsey et al. 2013).

Uses and trade

The trade in this species is local subsistence and local, national and international commercial trade in meat, live sales and trophy hunts. There is no anticipated negative effect on the population. Trade has had a positive effect through the reintroduction of the species into former parts of its range. Even though it is not a high-value species in the ecotourism industry, it is still utilised within this sector. However, where this subspecies has been introduced into areas beyond its natural range, it can subsequently prove difficult to remove, resulting in possible competition with other species and may ultimately become a threat to the indigenous fauna in these areas.

Conservation

The Common Impala is one of the most abundant antelopes in Africa, with about one-quarter of the population occurring in protected areas. Its future is secure as long as it continues to occur in large, adequately protected and managed populations in protected areas and private farms and conservancies. Landowners should continue to form conservancies to sustain wild and free-roaming herds and to share the economic and cultural benefits of this species with local communities. However, regulation of translocation is required to prevent inbreeding and hybridization with the extra-limital Black-faced Impala and to prevent Common Impala causing habitat degradation outside of its natural range. Similarly, reintroduction efforts should consider whether it is within the natural range of the subspecies and should reintroduce a suitable founder size. For example, the success of Black-faced Impala translocations was heavily influenced by the size of the founder population as well as the presence of predators in the recipient area (Matson et al. 2004). Reintroductions should follow the IUCN guidelines (IUCN/SSC 2013).

Recommendations for land managers and practitioners:

  • Sustainable utilisation of the Common Impala should be a priority for private landowners and communities who want to galvanise a wildlife-based economy. Conservationists should provide incentives for landowners to provide affordable, low-carbon protein to local communities and to create conservancies where the benefits of this subspecies are shared. 
  • An important consideration for wildlife managers is the possible role that Common Impala may play in propagating foot and mouth disease in other wildlife and domestic livestock populations. Impala are known carriers of foot and mouth disease and have transmitted the disease to cattle in the past (Vosloo et al. 2006). Consequently, control measures may need to be put in place in situations where wildlife and livestock may interact (Vosloo et al. 2009), or where Common Impala are sourced from potential foot and mouth disease areas for reintroduction to other areas.
  • There are no requirements for future supplementation from captive stocks, and captive breeding for conservation is not recommended.

Research priorities:

  • The extent of artificial selection and hybridisation within the wildlife ranching industry. Detailed information related to the trends in Impala populations within private reserves.
  • The feasibility of this species as alternative and sustainable source of protein in rural communities. 
  • Methods of creating wildlife-based economies from this species and its efficacy as a source of protein for local communities.
  • More robust harvesting models are required that will help managers calculate off-take rates that will ensure sustainable populations. Currently no research is being conducted on such models.
  • Evaluation of this species impact on the environment where it has been introduced/or applications to introduce it is pending approval.


Encouraged citizen actions:

  • Raise the awareness among the hunting community of the risks to wildlife populations from proliferation of selectively-bred colour variants.

Lead agencies, Partners and Funders

See the partners page