Rationale
This endemic species is restricted to moist grasslands and shrublands and occurs in two isolated subpopulations in the Western Cape (Paarl and Cape Town areas) and eastern grasslands of the Drakensberg of Kwazulu-Natal and Mpumalanga provinces, as well as occasionally occurring in coastal forests. These two subpopulations may represent separate species and should be reassessed following taxonomic resolution. The estimated area of occupancy (AOO), based on remaining natural fynbos and grassland habitat in all occupied grid cells, is 5,293 km2. However, since it relies on moist areas, effective AOO could be as low as 95 km2 based on 32 m buffer of natural vegetation around remaining wetlands. There has been 32.8% decline in natural wetlands nationally from 1990– 2013/14, which is a combination of both genuine wetland loss through anthropogenic activities and the generally drier conditions currently that in 1990. There is also a continuing loss of habitat from agricultural expansion, human settlement sprawl and mining. In KwaZulu-Natal alone, there was a 1.2% loss per annum of natural habitat from 1994 and 2011, which means there has been / will be a 12% loss of habitat over a ten year time period. Climate change is also an emerging threat predicted to significantly reduce area of occupancy in the future (P. Taylor unpubl. data), and may synergise negatively with ongoing land-use change. Additionally, the species is naturally rare and population size may well be below 10,000 mature individuals based on its current patchy distribution and specialised habitat requirements. However, density estimates are needed to confirm population size and further vetting of museum records is required to delimit its distribution more accurately. Thus, under a precautionary purview, the species is listed as Near Threatened B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv); C2a(i) based on restricted range, fragmented habitat patches, presumed small population size and ongoing and projected declines in habitat. Although the AOO is likely an underestimate, the true occupancy is not likely to be significantly over 2,000 km2. This species should be reassessed as more specific data are available, as it may qualify for a threatened category.
Distribution
Endemic to South African with a patchy distribution in the Western Cape (Paarl and Cape Town areas) and Eastern Cape, as well as the eastern foothills of the central and northern Drakensberg in KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga provinces (Monadjem et al. 2015). It occurs in the Afromontane-Afroalpine, Highveld and occasionally in the Coastal Forest Mosaic biotic zones (Taylor 2013). Otomys species are generally associated with mesic grasslands and moorlands within alpine, montane and sub-montane regions of Southern, Central, East and West Africa (Monadjem et al. 2015). This species occurs on mid-level grasslands from sea level up to at least 2,000 m asl. It has been referred to in various publications as being recorded from Eswatini but the records for this country have no specimen basis (A. Monadjem pers. comm. 2015). Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellet analysis reveals a potentially wider distribution in the Western Cape Province than previously recorded (Avery et al. 2005). However, further vetting of museum specimens is needed to delimit distribution more accurately.
Population trend
Trend
It is considered to be uncommon. For example, it is much less common than Otomys irroratus although occurring in similar habitats (Taylor 2013). However, it is occasionally common; for example, it was the only species of Otomys trapped in a pine plantation (N = 56; P. J. Taylor unpubl. data). The population size is currently unknown but there is very low trapping success for this species throughout its range. As such, there may be fewer than 10,000 mature individuals.
Conservation
This species is presumably present in several protected areas, but these remain to be documented comprehensively. Mitigating habitat loss outside of protected areas is urgently. The following interventions should be implemented:
- Using previously cultivated areas for development instead of remaining natural areas: In Mpumalanga, for example, old lands or previously ploughed areas now left fallow make up 8.9% of the grassland biome (Lötter 2015), and these areas should be prioritised for further development. Similarly, in KwaZulu-Natal, abandoned agricultural fields on marginal lands offer an opportunity for further development instead of transforming virgin land and at least 4% of the landscape is available for this (Jewitt et al. 2015)
- Wetland conservation and restoration: land managers should maintain a vegetation buffer to reduce impacts of land-use practices (Driver et al. 2012).
- Holistic management of ranchlands: including de-stocking, rotational grazing and buffering wetland vegetation, are encouraged.
Recommendations for land managers and practitioners:
· Land managers should decrease stocking rates to maintain vegetation around wetlands.
· Prioritise old fields for development in systematic conservation planning.