Red List of South African Species

Alternatively, Explore species
Endangered (EN)

Rationale

The Red Steenbras (Petrus rupestris) is endemic to South Africa and is a long-lived species that exhibits slow growth and late maturity. This species is an apex predator that occurs on sub-tidal reefs throughout its distributional range. Although evidence suggests that P. rupestris is highly fecund, this species does not attain sexual maturity until approximately seven years of age. Adults are believed to undertake an eastward migration to the Eastern Cape coast and southern KwaZulu-Natal where they aggregate to spawn and are actively targeted. Juveniles inhabit sub-tidal reefs and exhibit strong site fidelity which may make them susceptible to localized overfishing. Petrus rupestris has experienced a substantial range contraction due to the severe depletion of the stock as well as decreases in abundance in areas where this species was once common. The overexploited status of P. rupestris has been recognized for at least the past 30 years and although strict regulations were gradually implemented, stock recovery was not apparent, ultimately leading to the collapse of the stock and the implementation of a moratorium in 2012. There is a need for more precise information regarding the spatial and temporal occurrence of spawning aggregations and the distribution of eggs and larvae of P. rupestris. Petrus rupestris experienced a decline in CPUE of 84% from the 1930s to the early 1990s in the southern Cape as well as a dramatic decline of >75% from 1986 to 1998 on the Agulhas Bank. The total reported commercial catch for this species has declined from about 75 tonnes (1985–1992) to an average of less than 4.3 tonnes (2001-2007) indicative of a ~95% decrease. In addition, from 1985 to 2007 CPUE declined from 1.1 kg/man/hr to 0.5 kg/man/hr. While this later decline may be partly due to the strict regulations introduced to protect this species, much of the decline took place during the latter half of the 20th century and there has been no indication of any stock recovery after the regulations were implemented. In addition, standardized abundance indices provide further evidence for a consistent population decline of 95% in the Western Cape and 65% in the Eastern Cape. This evidence represents an overall population decline of at least 75% within three generation lengths (51 years), and the species is thus listed as Endangered under A2bd. These documented population reductions, however, are almost reaching the thresholds of listing under Critically Endangered, and a thorough evaluation of the stock is urgently needed to determine the current standing of the populations and the effectiveness of the moratorium currently in place.

Distribution

Petrus rupestris is endemic to South Africa and is known from Table Bay, Southwestern Cape to St Lucia, KwaZulu-Natal (Smith and Heemstra 1991, Heemstra and Heemstra 2004). The stock has been substantially depleted resulting in a range contraction, leaving the core of the remaining adult stock located off the Eastern Cape (B. Mann, Oceanographic Research Institute pers. obs.; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry unpublished data). This species occurs from depths of five to at least 160 m (Smale 1988, Mann and Kerwath 2013). Adults occur primarily between Cape Agulhas and southern KwaZulu-Natal while juveniles are found from Cape Point to Kei Mouth (Buxton and Smale 1984, 1989; Smale 1988; Griffiths 2000).

Population trend

Trend

The Petrus rupestris fishery has been closed since the implementation of a moratorium in 2012 (Department of Agriculture, Forest and Fisheries 2012). Petrus rupestris was historically an important recreational and commercial species in skiboat catches throughout its range (Penney et al. 1999, Griffiths 2000). In more recent years, this species formed a relatively small component of recreational and commercial skiboat catches in most areas except the Eastern Cape where it still comprised an important component if the catch (Smale and Buxton 1985, Hecht and Tilney 1989, Hecht and Buxton 1993, Penney and Wilke 1993, Fielding et al. 1994, Brouwer and Buxton 2002, Griffiths and Lamberth 2002, Fennessy et al. 2003, Donovan 2010). Historically, P. rupestris was taken by shore anglers in False Bay (Schoeman and Schoeman 1990) and taken on occasion by spearfishermen (van der Elst 1993). Petrus ruepstris has been reported in incidental catches from the inshore trawl fishery and shark longline fleet (DAFF unpublished data). Freezer vessels introduced in the early 1980s were equipped with high-precision navigational equipment and long-range capability and were able to effectively exploit previously unexploited  populations of P. rupestris further offshore on the Agulhas Banks. This species rapidly became a highly prized fish and resulted in increased competition between vessels (S. Knobel and K. Kingma captains of freezer boats pers. comm.). Catch rates subsequently declined rapidly from about 15 kg per fisher per day in 1986 to around 2 kg per fisher per day since 1990 (Griffiths 2000).

CPUE declined by more than 90% throughout the 20th century (Griffiths 2000, Griffiths and Wilke 2002). A slight increase in CPUE was observed in the former Transkei between 1984 and 1992 (Hecht and Buxton 1993) but is thought that this was due to improved targeting on spawning aggregations on deep reefs (B. Mann, Oceanographic Research Institute pers. obs.). A similar increase in CPUE was recorded on the offshore Agulhas Banks during the 1980s and was due to improved targeting by larger freezer vessels but did not last long (Penney and Wilke 1993, Griffiths 2000, Griffiths and Wilke 2002). Nominal commercial skiboat CPUE data stored on the National Marine Linefish System showed a further 90% decline between 1985 and 2007 from 0.045 kg per man per hour to 0.005 kg per man per hour and commercial ski boat catches declined from 96 tonnes in 1991 to 1.9 tonnes in 2005 (National Marine Linefish System unpublished data). An additional analysis was conducted to corroborate these trends. Generalized Additive Models were fitted to standardize the probability of capturing P. rupestris along the South African coast by removing the effects of targeting and spatial and temporal variations (Winker and Attwood 2014). The modeling framework was based on approach described in Winker et al. (2013). The probability of capture is widely used for rare species and is considered to be more defensible than catch rates in weight because of it being less sensitive to management regulations such as catch restrictions by bag limits. The trends for the period 1985-2011 show that the capture probability of P.rupestris declined from 16% in 1985-86 to less than 1% 2010-2011 between Cape Point and Tsitsikamma and from 23% to less than 8% along the Eastern Cape and Kwazulu-Natal coast, corresponding to declines of more than 95% and 64% respectively. Percentage catch composition declined significantly in KwaZulu-Natal  and Cape waters throughout the 20th century (Penney et al. 1999, Griffiths 2000). Catch composition of P. rupestris in the Port Alfred skiboat fishery indicated that this species declined from 44% to 3.3% to 9.9% for commercial catches and 15.3% to 4.6% to 5.1% for recreational fisheries for the periods 1985 to 1987, 1996 to 1998, and 2006 to 2008 for the "Sparid group" respectively (Hecht and Tilney 1989, Donovan 2010). Before 1970, a decline in the catch rates of adults was observed off northern Transkei and southern KwaZulu-Natal (van der Elst and Garratt 1984) and in the East London area (Winch 1999). Catch rates of higher trophic level reef fish declined substantially between the two fishery-independent surveys conducted from 1931 to 1933 and 1987 to 1993 off the Southern Cape with the decline in CPUE of P. rupestris at 84%. If the P. rupestris population had not been seeded by partially protected adult stocks on the offshore Agulhas Bank and Transkei, declines would have been much greater. Based on fishery-independent catch composition surveys from 1931 to 1933 conducted off the southern Cape, P. rupestris comprised 12% in the first survey and 6% in the second (Griffiths 2000).

Petrus rupestris has undergone a coast-wise and seaward contraction in the range of adult abundance (Griffiths 2000). The status of the stock is <25% and is considered to be collapsed based on a CPUE decline >90%  throughout the 20th century (Griffiths 2000, Griffiths and Wilke 2002) and it has been suggested that the P. rupestris stock has been reduced to <5% of the pristine level (Griffiths and Lamberth 2002). This species has also undergone a range contraction thought to be associated with a reduction in the population (van der Elst and Garratt 1984, van der Elst  et al. 1992, Penney and Wilke 1993, Penney  et al. 1999, Griffiths 2000). Large individuals of this species were commonly caught from the shore in the Southwestern Cape in the beginning of the 20th century, indicative of a seaward contraction in the adult distributional range (Biden 1930, Horne 1955, Burman 1989). Commercial fishermen along the South African coast have stated that catches of P. rupestris have declined dramatically in the past three decades (Smale 1988). Catch data from line-boats operating along the east coast and landing their catches in Durban support this overall decline (P.A. Garratt, Oceanographic Research Institute pers. comm.). During the early 1950s, P. rupestris became less abundant in the False Bay, Plettenberg Bay and Tsitsikamma areas (Schoeman 1957) which suggests that this trend was widely spread (Griffiths 2000). The Agulhas Banks provide spawning grounds for large adults and the demise of these individuals is likely to have had a negative impact on recruitment to the near-shore fishing grounds off the southern Cape and southwestern Cape (Griffiths 2000). Numbers of adult fish are still found in the Eastern Cape where they receive protection both in a number of MPAs and on deep reefs where they are difficult to access due to the strong prevailing Agulhas Current (Hecht and Buxton 1993). 

Threats

Petrus rupestris is a long lived and slowing growing species that migrates northwards to the Eastern Cape where they aggregate to spawn and were historically targeted by recreational and commercial line fishermen (Mann and Kerwath 2013). This species exhibits life history attributes that make it extremely vulnerable to overexploitation and make the recovery of the stock more challenging. Petrus rupestris can live to at least 33 years and does not reach sexual maturity until 7.2 years of age and a size of 63 cm (Smale and Punt 1991, Smale 1988). Although there is currently a moratorium in place for this species illegal fishing, especially on spawning aggregations, poses a serious threat to P. rupestris and may impede stock recovery.

Petrus rupestris has been subject to a range contraction attributed to a decrease in population size (van der Elst and Garratt 1984, van der Elst et al. 1992, Penney and Wilke 1993, Penney et al. 1999, Griffiths 2000). Stocks <25% of the pristine status are indicative of stock depletion in long lived species and yield a high risk of collapse (Clark 1991, Mace and Sissenwine 1993, Thompson 1993, Mace 1994). Reductions in CPUE of >90% coincide with spawner biomass ratios of <10% and are indicative of severe stock depletion (Griffiths 2000). The P. rupestris stock is currently believed to have collapsed with < 5% spawning biomass per recruit (SBPR) and a CPUE decrease by more than 90% (Mann and Kerwath 2013).

Uses and trade

The Petrus rupestris fishery has been closed since 2012 (Department of Agriculture, Forest, and Fisheries 2012). Petrus rupestris was historically an important component of recreational and commercial skiboat catches throughout its range (Penney et al. 1999, Griffiths 2000). In more recent years due to heavy exploitation, this species formed a relatively small component of recreational and commercial skiboat catches in most areas except the Eastern Cape where it still comprised an important component of the catch (Smale and Buxton 1985, Hecht and Tilney 1989, Hecht and Buxton 1993, Penney and Wilke 1993, Fielding et al. 1994, Brouwer and Buxton 2002, Griffiths and Lamberth 2002, Fennessy et al. 2003, Donovan 2010).

Conservation

The fishery for Petrus rupestris was closed to both commercial and recreational fishing in November 2012 with the implementation of a moratorium due to the overexploited status of the stock (Department of Forest, Agriculture, and Fisheries 2012; Mann and Kerwath 2013). 

Historically, P. rupestris was managed under a suite of regulations including a minimum size limit of 60 cm TL, a bag limit of one fish per person per day for both commercial and recreational linefishers and a three-month closure from the 1st of September to the 30th November each year (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2012). In addition to this, the species is present in several large no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) on the South African coast including De Hoop, Goukamma, Tsitsikamma, Sardinia Bay, Bird Island, Amathole, Dwesa-Cwebe and Pondoland. Both the Tsitsikamma National Park (Buxton and Smale 1989) and De Hoop Marine Protected Areas (Smale 1988) have been shown to provide an important refuge for juveniles of this species. As the adults spawn in the area between East London and southern KwaZulu-Natal, the only MPAs which provide protection for adults are Amathole, Dwesa-Cwebe and Pondoland MPAs (B. Mann, ORI personal observation).

The overexploitation of P. rupestris has been acknowledged for the past 30 years but despite the introduction of stricter regulations, there was no evidence of stock recovery. The result of this was the implementation of a moratorium on catches of P. rupestris in November 2012 which requires strong enforcement to prevent illegal fishing activities. Additionally, angler awareness is also required to educate fishers on the correct manner in which to release unintentionally caught fish to reduce harm and maximize their chance of survival. It is recommended that the moratorium remains in place for at least 10 years during which time there should be a thorough evaluation of the stock (Mann and Kerwath 2013).

Lead agencies, Partners and Funders

See the partners page